The methane content of the atmosphere is rising dramatically.
Since 2007, methane levels in the atmosphere have been rising sharply, and have even doubled again between 2014 and 2019.
This is probably due to rising emissions and less biodegradation, due to an overtaxing of biodegradation resources.
Methane is formed by the decomposition of organic material under exclusion of air.
Its sources include waste landfills, wetlands such as swamps or rice fields, agriculture and livestock farming, fossil fuel extraction and fracking.
In addition, climate change has set in motion a process that leads to the thawing of permafrost soils, which in turn releases large quantities of methane.
Melting poles and rising sea temperatures also lead to changes in the living conditions of many microorganisms that have been a natural barrier to methane.
A veritable chain reaction develops.
The main cause must be blamed on humanity.
Without ifs and buts!
Methane is much more harmful to the climate than the much discussed CO2.
Over a period of 100 years, the same amount of methane causes 28 times as much damage.
It remains in the atmosphere for 8 - 10 years and is broken down by OH radicals to water and then CO2.
The amount of OH radicals decreases in relation to the methane because the oxidation reactions increase strongly due to the high methane concentration and the OH radicals are consumed as a natural resource.
In addition, the oxidation reaction produces water vapor in the stratosphere, thereby increasing the greenhouse effect many times over.
The climate debate must take methane into account and take this major threat seriously.
But how is this goal to be achieved if the values worldwide are rising ever steeper.
One thing is already becoming apparent.
The climate goals can no longer be achieved if we continue to live our lives and our way of dealing with global problems as before.
Much can only be achieved together.
What can we as ZANNI GROUP do?
We can at least help you to prevent methane from rotting waste in landfills by providing you with the technology to do so.
Surely you could counter that CO2 is produced by incineration.
That is absolut correct, but to a much lesser emission and with the possibility of binding and storing this CO2.
CO2 capturing are the magic words.
That means it can be processed and also consumed selectively.
This is not possible with this type of creeping methane from decay and degassing.
If it could be captured, it would be useful, but unfortunately not in this form.
Therefore, such arguments run into the void and do not lead us to the goal of a maximum global warming of 1.5° Celsius.
Every step towards this goal is worthwhile.